考察点正好是之前做到过的32位至64位模式切换,只不过表现形式有所出入。在C++程序中存在的大量虚函数一定程度上提高了静态分析的难度,算是入门C++逆向的一个切入点。值得学习。
考察C++逆向。
总体思路:动态调试,黑盒测试。
Windows 32位程序,无壳。
注:以下分析如未作特殊说明,默认基址为
0x251000题目存在一些花指令,不多做阐述,nop修复即可。
比较多的虚函数,同时能看到关键词
DuiLib有关
DuiLib能够从网上找到N篇文章介绍切入点,随便挂一个通过虚函数跳转最终定位到按钮回调函数
sub_26D2D0简单调试分析后,能够发现首先是进行了变表的base64编码,具体位置在
0x26E530,伪代码分析特征还是比较明显的当然最大的特征当属编码表,其特征位于函数
0x26E250,伪代码如下int __cdecl base64Maps(int a1)
{
  int *v1; // eax
  char v3[8]; // [esp+4h] [ebp-68h] BYREF
  int v4; // [esp+Ch] [ebp-60h]
  _BYTE base64[65]; // [esp+10h] [ebp-5Ch] BYREF
  unsigned int v6[2]; // [esp+51h] [ebp-1Bh] BYREF
  int v7; // [esp+68h] [ebp-4h]
  v4 = 0;
  sub_26D5D0((char *)v6 + 3, 8u);
  qmemcpy(base64, "prvo9CHSJOcPIb6xRVUXQz0qBGDE72LNZduaefYT5K_8-4FAhlimjkngt1yMWs3w!", sizeof(base64));
  v1 = (int *)__FrameHandler3::TryBlockMap::TryBlockMap(
                (__FrameHandler3::TryBlockMap *)v3,
                (const struct _s_FuncInfo *)base64,
                (unsigned int)v6);
  sub_26EA90((char *)v6 + 3, *v1, v1[1]);
  v7 = 0;
  sub_26EAD0((void *)a1, (int)v6 + 3);
  v4 |= 1u;
  v7 = -1;
  sub_26EA70();
  return a1;
}
下面进行验证
动态调试得到编码串
尝试变表解密
import base64
baseMaps = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789+/="
newMaps = "prvo9CHSJOcPIb6xRVUXQz0qBGDE72LNZduaefYT5K_8-4FAhlimjkngt1yMWs3w!"
cipherText = "EHsnG0bjGT44BqIhETj!"
cipherText = cipherText.translate(cipherText.maketrans(newMaps, baseMaps))
print(base64.b64decode(cipherText.encode('utf-8')).decode())
解得
lovectf{mas0n},验证成功进入下一步
经过调试分析确定总体逻辑如下图
单步调试过程中会发现在
verify运行至一个段间跳转时出现异常。反复调试后,最终发现突破点在于其进行远跳转前,32位至64位模式的切换。
只不过在这里的表现形式与往常有所不同
关于32位程序至64位程序的切换,先前也发过文章 
东华杯2021大学生网安邀请赛知晓其模式切换后,强制指定PE64标识
放入IDA,为方便定位函数,Rebase Segment,基址设为0
通过调试得到调用函数地址,减去基址后得到偏移量
0x146f0定位函数,得到伪代码后,看到了函数调用
汇编下形式为
call rdi翻找之后能够知道
rdi来自于指令mov rdi, [rsp+arg_0]向上分析
确定函数偏移为
0x145AC简单分析伪代码,结合代码复用,能够确定其check逻辑如下
__int64 __fastcall sub_145AC(char *a1, __int64 a2)
{
  unsigned int v4; // edx
  char v5; // al
  __int64 v6; // rcx
  int v7; // edx
  char v8; // al
  char *v9; // rcx
  __int64 v10; // rax
  unsigned int v11; // edx
  char v12; // al
  __int64 v13; // rcx
  char v14; // cl
  __int64 v15; // r8
  int *v16; // rax
  char v17; // al
  __int64 v18; // rcx
  char v19; // cl
  __int64 v20; // r8
  int *v21; // rax
  int v23; // [rsp+4h] [rbp-3Ch] BYREF
  char v24; // [rsp+8h] [rbp-38h]
  __int16 v25; // [rsp+9h] [rbp-37h]
  char v26; // [rsp+Bh] [rbp-35h]
  unsigned int v27; // [rsp+Ch] [rbp-34h]
  char v28[48]; // [rsp+10h] [rbp-30h] BYREF
  v27 = 44;
  v4 = 0;
  *(__m128i *)v28 = _mm_load_si128((const __m128i *)&xmmword_14408);
  *(__m128i *)&v28[32] = _mm_load_si128((const __m128i *)&xmmword_143F8);
  *(__m128i *)&v28[16] = _mm_load_si128(xmmword_14418);
  do
  {
    v5 = v4 - 52;
    v6 = v4++;
    v28[v6] ^= v5;
  }
  while ( v4 < v27 );                           // 还原base64编码串
  v28[v27] = 0;
  v7 = 0;
  v8 = *a1;
  if ( *a1 )
  {
    v9 = a1;
    do
    {
      if ( v8 != v9[v28 - a1] )                 // strcmp
        break;
      ++v9;
      ++v7;
      v8 = *v9;
    }
    while ( *v9 );
  }
  v10 = v7;
  v11 = 0;
  v24 = -48;
  if ( a1[v10] == v28[v10] )                    // bingo
  {
    v23 = 0x78063019;                           // 正确
    v25 = 0;
    v26 = 0;
    do
    {
      v12 = v11 - 52;
      v13 = v11++;
      *((_BYTE *)&v23 + v13) ^= v12;
    }
    while ( v11 < 4 );
    v24 = 0;
    v14 = v23;
    if ( (_BYTE)v23 )
    {
      v15 = a2 - (_QWORD)&v23;
      v16 = &v23;
      do
      {
        *((_BYTE *)v16 + v15) = v14;
        v16 = (int *)((char *)v16 + 1);
        v14 = *(_BYTE *)v16;
      }
      while ( *(_BYTE *)v16 );
    }
  }
  else
  {
    v23 = 0x3C002078;                           // 错误
    v25 = 0;
    v26 = 0;
    do
    {
      v17 = v11 - 52;
      v18 = v11++;
      *((_BYTE *)&v23 + v18) ^= v17;
    }
    while ( v11 < 4 );
    v24 = 0;
    v19 = v23;
    if ( (_BYTE)v23 )
    {
      v20 = a2 - (_QWORD)&v23;
      v21 = &v23;
      do
      {
        *((_BYTE *)v21 + v20) = v19;
        v21 = (int *)((char *)v21 + 1);
        v19 = *(_BYTE *)v21;
      }
      while ( *(_BYTE *)v21 );
    }
  }
  return 0i64;
}
简单异或还原明文验证猜想
"""
v23 = 0x78063019;
    v25 = 0;
    v26 = 0;
    do
    {
      v12 = v11 - 52;
      v13 = v11++;
      *((_BYTE *)&v23 + v13) ^= v12;
    }
    while ( v11 < 4 );
"""
v11 = 0
v23 = bytearray(int.to_bytes(0x78063019, length=4, byteorder="little"))
while 1:
    v12 = v11 - 52
    v13 = v11
    v11 += 1
    v23[v13] ^= v12 & 0xff
    if v11 >= 4:
        break
print(v23.decode('gbk'))
# 正确
最终解题脚本如下
import base64
"""
  v27 = 44;
  v4 = 0;
  *(__m128i *)v28 = _mm_load_si128((const __m128i *)&xmmword_15408);
  *(__m128i *)&v28[32] = _mm_load_si128((const __m128i *)&xmmword_153F8);
  *(__m128i *)&v28[16] = _mm_load_si128(xmmword_15418);
  do
  {
    v5 = v4 - 52;
    v6 = v4++;
    v28[v6] ^= v5;
  }
  while ( v4 < v27 );
  v28[v27] = 0;
"""
xmmArr = [0x0B3E38188BB9CBA9DBAFFB697ABA2948B, 0x0BFDBD9AAD6D4BCA1878490B0B5AE858C, 0x0F8D6D7A7BAB89480B78A94B9AE]
v27 = 44
v28 = b''
for xmm in xmmArr:
    v28 += int.to_bytes(xmm, length=16, byteorder="little")
v28 = bytearray(v28)
v4 = 0
while 1:
    v5 = v4 - 52
    v6 = v4
    v4 += 1
    v28[v6] ^= v5 & 0xff
    if v4 >= v27:
        break
v28[v27] = 0
print(v28)
cipherText = v28.decode()
baseMaps = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789+/="
newMaps = "prvo9CHSJOcPIb6xRVUXQz0qBGDE72LNZduaefYT5K_8-4FAhlimjkngt1yMWs3w!"
cipherText = cipherText.translate(cipherText.maketrans(newMaps, baseMaps))
print(base64.b64decode(cipherText.encode('utf-8')).decode())
